The presence of the future monarch, resounding chants of “Three Lions On A Shirt” from the crowd, and extensive coverage on front pages of newspapers indicate a shift in the recognition and celebration of women’s football. While fans cherish women’s football as much as men’s, the recent victory of the England Lionesses in the Euros highlights disparities in treatment and recognition.
Had it been the men’s team winning, the scenario would have been vastly different. The expectation of royal presence, a dedicated anthem, a reception hosted by the Prime Minister, and continuous media coverage beyond victories would have been the norm. There would have been a national holiday to mark the occasion, despite the economic implications.
Although the Lionesses received honors and their manager, Sarina Wiegman, is set to be made an honorary dame, the contrast with the treatment of Gareth Southgate, who was knighted despite lesser achievements, is noteworthy. Discussions on gender disparity in football pay have been ongoing, with disparities in salaries and prize money between men’s and women’s teams evident.
The societal perception of women’s achievements in sports compared to men’s is reflected in the unequal treatment and expectations placed on female athletes. Despite breaking barriers and excelling in their sport, women athletes often face undervaluation and less recognition compared to their male counterparts. The disparity extends beyond sports into various aspects of society, perpetuating gender biases.
The unique challenges and triumphs of women footballers underscore the ongoing efforts for gender equality in sports and beyond. As women’s football continues to make strides, there is hope for a future where success is recognized without gender biases, paving the way for a more equitable society.