Victims of Jeffrey Epstein are calling for Lord Peter Mandelson to lose his UK ambassadorship following revelations of his close ties to the convicted sex offender. Documents released by the US House Oversight Committee exposed Mandelson’s extensive involvement with Epstein, including referring to him as his “best pal” and sharing personal experiences in the billionaire’s residences. The disclosure, which includes entries in Epstein’s “birthday book” compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell, has sparked outrage among survivors of Epstein’s abuse, who view Mandelson’s remarks as deeply inappropriate.
The victims have condemned Mandelson’s affectionate messages to Epstein and are urging the UK Government to revoke his diplomatic role, emphasizing that his association with the disgraced financier is unacceptable. The survivors, who have endured exploitation and trafficking, feel betrayed by powerful figures like Mandelson who maintained friendly ties with their abuser. They demand accountability and assert that Mandelson should face consequences for his actions.
Previous reports by JP Morgan indicated Lord Mandelson stayed at Epstein’s New York residence while Epstein was serving time for his crimes. Correspondence between Mandelson and Epstein regarding regulatory matters further underscore their relationship. Allegations suggest that Mandelson sought Epstein’s assistance in arranging meetings with prominent figures, raising concerns about the nature of their interactions.
The recent release of the full contents of the letter from Lord Mandelson to Epstein has amplified scrutiny over their connection. The Oversight Committee’s publication of the material shed light on the timeline of events, indicating that the interactions occurred prior to 2003. The disturbing nature of Epstein’s abuse, spanning decades and involving numerous victims, has heightened the urgency for accountability and justice in light of the newly uncovered details surrounding his associates.
When contacted for a response, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office referred to Mandelson’s prior statements expressing regret over his association with Epstein. The unfolding revelations have reignited public debate over the responsibilities and ethical obligations of individuals in positions of influence, especially in relation to their associations with individuals involved in criminal activities.